A friend recently brought to my attention the commencement speech delivered by David Foster Wallace at Kenyon College in 2005 (http://publicnoises.blogspot.com/2009/05/david-foster-wallace-kenyon.html).

I urge you all to read the speech.  Great insight.  Great wisdom.

I found one section to be particularly helpful to screenwriters.  In defense of his use of a “banal platitude,” Wallace said:  “the fact is that in the day-to-day trenches of adult existence, banal platitudes can have a life or death importance.”

How does this apply to screenwriting?  In my experience, many screenwriters look down on stories that explore so-called “Universal Truths,” themes like “Love Conquers All,” “To Thine Own Self Be True,” “With Great Power Comes Responsibility,” etc.

These messages are dismissed as clichés.  Hackneyed and trite.  “Banal platitudes.” 

But they also happen to represent the fundamental issues that we struggle with most in the day-to-day trenches of our lives.  The core questions of human existence.  The stuff we care about above all else, as relevant today as in Shakespeare’s time.

To trot out yet another cliché, “clichés become clichés for a reason.”

Am I actually suggesting that aspiring screenwriters not try to thematically explore something new and original?

Yeah, I guess I kinda am.

Basically, I think that all the key questions of life, of what it really means to be human, have already been explored.  (And that the very same questions will continue to be explored for as long as humanity exists.)

So, rather than try to find completely new and unique questions/themes to explore, I suggest that aspiring screenwriters instead turn to these “Universal Truths,” these “Banal Platitudes,” and strive to explore them in completely new and unique ways.  Ways that speak to us, and our world, today.  Ways that maybe – just maybe – will provide us new answers and/or insights into these vital and ageless issues.

Like “Eternal Sunshine of the Eternal Mind” (“Better to Have Loved and Lost Than to Never Have Loved at All”)…

And “Sideways” (“More Important Than Worldly Success is Love”)…

And “Wall-E” (“What Matters Most are the Connections We Make”)…

I could go on and on, but you get the point:  Instead of trying to say something new, try to say something timeless… in a new way that speaks to us today.

Steve Mazur is a screenwriter and one of the judges for The Script-a-thon.


 


Comments

06/28/2010 8:45am

Enjoyed the Wallace speech ("Morning boys, hows the water?" = priceless) and your blog. It's a self-evident truth that human beings think in symbols and our brains always try to attach symbolic meanings to any event we see or hear about. Makes sense to keep giving our screenplay human quandaries and stakes that universally resonate with the entire species. A cliche, banal or otherwise, most often gets to be that way because it's true. Thanks!

Reply
06/29/2010 11:18am

Thanks for the post, Steve! A very interesting read.

Reply
John Linde
04/18/2011 6:57pm

As much as David Foster Wallace eschewed irony as a cowardly device, I couldn't help but be overwhelmed by it reading this bizarre defense for banality summed up in the line "Am I actually suggesting that aspiring screenwriters not try to thematically explore something new and original? Yeah, I guess I kinda am." ....what a frightening belief to pass on to young writers. For example, the core idea that it has all been said before discounts the symbiotic evolution going on as humans meld with the things they create....computers, recursive art, nanotechnology, television to name a few. Steve Mazur, do you really believe that you are the same sort of child intellectually (having been raised on television) as a child of the Middle Ages? You are fundamentally different, and that is reflected in your art. As much as David Foster Wallace talked about the comfort of banal platitudes, his writing was anything but...he wrote complicated, ghastly uncommercial pieces that defied formula writing and cliches. Steve, I recommend you read Infinite Jest to appreciate the irony of offering him in support of your post.

Reply



Leave a Reply